In a unanimous decision due to be published on May 15, the Connecticut Supreme Court has ruled that employers can be held liable for failing to protect employees from harassment based upon sexual orientation. In Patino v. Birken Manufacturing Company, a former employee of the jet engine component maker Birken Manufacturing, Co. accused the company of… Continue Reading
Category Archives: Harassment
Subscribe to Harassment RSS FeedPosner – “Nebulous suspicions voiced by a busybody” not protected under Title VII
Posted in HarassmentA part-time female hospital employee complained about her new male boss. Her complaints — mainly generalized criticisms — included disapproval of his “presentation of himself in public,” his “remarks and appropriateness,” his “obvious attraction to/fear of women” and his “leadership in relationship to women.” The hospital, worried about potential hostile work environment implications, investigated. During… Continue Reading
Uncorroborated Testimony Sufficient To Get To Jury Trial
Posted in Harassment, LitigationA new decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit provides a stark reminder to employers of the ease with which a former employee can get a lawsuit before a jury. Berry v. Chicago Transit Auth., Case No. 07-2288 (7th Cir. Aug. 23, 2010). Cynthia Berry alleged that a coworker sexually harassed… Continue Reading
Kozinski – Offensive Workplace Speech Protected By First Amendment
Posted in Constitution, HarassmentThe tension between the First Amendment and the right to be free of workplace harassment on the basis of protected status has been addressed by the Ninth Circuit in Rodriguez v. Maricopa Co. Comm. Coll., a case in which employees complained that a professor’s race-based emails created a hostile work environment. Judge Kozinski, with Justice… Continue Reading
No Faragher/Ellerth Defense for New York City Employers
Posted in HarassmentNew York City employers may not use the Faragher/Ellerth defense to harassment claims lodged under New York City’s Human Rights Law. That’s the verdict of New York’s Court of Appeals. (Zakrzewska v. New School. 2010 NY LEXIS 632 [May 6, 2010]). Instead, New York City employers will be strictly liable for harassment by supervisory or… Continue Reading
U.S. v. Stevens & Hostile Work Environment Law
Posted in Constitution, HarassmentRecently, SCOTUS overturned a federal law banning depictions of animal cruelty because it violated the First Amendment as an impermissibly broad, content-based restriction on speech. (U.S. v. Stevens) What possible connection could this case have to employment law you ask? Title VII — to the extent it imposes liability on employers for creating or permitting… Continue Reading
Employers: Be Careful When Checking Employees’ Social Networking Sites
Posted in Harassment, PrivacyForty-five percent of employers use social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace or Twitter to research job candidates, according to a CareerBuilder.com survey. Thirty-five percent reported having refused to hire candidates based on content found on those sites. Obviously, employers have valid reasons for viewing these sites; even the Florida Board of Bar Examiners recently suggested that bar applicants’ web postings may reflect an applicant’s character and… Continue Reading
